Boyhood

Richard Linklater filmed actor Ellar Coltrane over 12 years.

“Boyhood” isn’t a movie; it’s a time capsule. Filmed over 12 years, Director Richard Linklater has done the remarkable and captured a life in progress. It’s the themes of every adolescent, coming of age story rolled into one journey. This is a movie that you feel you can live inside, and one that feels like it could continue forever.

Linklater’s idea seems simple and high concept on paper. Let’s make a movie watching a 5-year-old age to 18. Let’s have him deal with family, childhood, puberty, life choices, romance, sex, and let’s watch it unfold in real-time. Let’s take the adolescent life lessons that come packed into a few months, weeks or a single day in movies like Linklater’s own “Dazed and Confused” or “School of Rock” and apply them over the course of a lifetime.

The remarkable challenge though is that it’s never been done. To make a single film over such a lengthy period of time, to wrangle actors year in and year out and to take the time to watch a person grow presents enormous challenges.

“Boyhood” has an uncanny sense of self and time, one in which the machinations of the movie are as unpredictable and volatile as life itself. It remarkably captures the culture and the feeling throughout the 2000s, understanding ramifications about the movie’s present, despite the impossibility of predicting their relevance in the future. Linklater remains true to his characters and is perceptive to their growth years after their lives and the culture around them have been rewritten.

There has been remarkable hype surrounding “Boyhood”, but it’s a fact that never in the history of cinema has a movie been so in tuned to how we grow, how we change and how life happens around us, simply because never before has a director devoted as much time and patience to his subjects as Linklater does here. Continue reading “Boyhood”

Before Midnight

With “Before Midnight,” Richard Linklater continues to deepen the themes in this beautiful franchise.

If there’s one thing “Before Midnight,” Richard Linklater’s powerfully moving threequel to one of the best love sagas in movie history, has to teach us about middle age, it’s that life is no longer all about you.

Linklater’s most daring addition to “Midnight” could be having two completely different characters walking and talking in tandem, not solely Jesse and Celine. The opposite was once true, and the plotless, intimate focus on just these two young lovers was what made 1995’s “Before Sunrise” so effortlessly experimental. By adding a few characters who fall into familiar conventions, “Midnight” may be the least experimental of Linklater’s trilogy, but he continues to deepen these themes and lives in ways that couldn’t have been imagined if this trilogy was preconceived. Continue reading “Before Midnight”

Side by Side: Clerks. and Before Sunrise

“Clerks.” and “Before Sunrise” are two very different films, but they’re both cult indie ’90s movies that share much in common.

“Side by Side” is a new series I hope to continue in addition to my “Rapid Response” reviews. But rather than a quick reaction to a single film, these pieces intend to take two seemingly different films, watched in succession, and find their common ground.

“I’m not even supposed to be here today!” That’s Dante’s final plea in “Clerks.” but it’s also the reason Jesse and Celine fell in love in “Before Sunrise.”

Somehow that accidental situation feels more real as a result, but still it’s a wonderful fantasy, one that shows if only things had gone as they were supposed to, it might’ve never been.

“Clerks.” and “Before Sunrise” are two very different films, one a cult comedy and the other a cult romance, and yet each is a mid-90’s indie darling that captures a gritty, down to Earth human mentality with intellectual, thought provoking, ordinary and innovative dialogue that, in all actuality, could not be more of a beautiful auteur fantasy.

Both films wear their naturalism on their sleeves. For “Clerks,” the grimy black & white and amateurish acting scream DIY instead of Hollywood, regardless of how Kevin Smith first wanted it to look. And “Before Sunrise” defiantly resists a plot; the love story is the reason they’re together, but the conversation as they do nothing but walk around and play pinball in dingy German bars is why we stay.

Clerks.

Watching the two in succession shows how even in “naturalism” there is a distinct difference in style. It would be somewhat hypocritical to think “Clerks” is the more vulgar or morbid film given how often Celine and Jesse discuss their first crushes, the certainty of death and their desperate urge to have sex in the park (twice! if you’ve seen the second one). Similarly, it would be naïve to call “Sunrise” the more inherently intelligent, as Smith models “Clerks.” loosely off “The Divine Comedy,” he deconstructs scenes and comedic expectations with ease and his character Randal plays like some Shakespearean jester appearing and interjecting wisdom and mischief into Dante’s life. Continue reading “Side by Side: Clerks. and Before Sunrise”