The Overnight

Patrick Brice’s ensemble comedy is a movie truly for adults, with Adam Scott, Taylor Schilling and Jason Schwartzman.

TheOvernightPosterMaking friends as an adult is hard. This much we know. Sex can be complicated, and awkward. This much we all know very well. But when posed with the challenge of making friends and breaking out of your shell despite all the misgivings of being socially or sexually awkward, it can be extremely challenging.

“The Overnight” pushes those adult challenges to the limit in a film that gradually becomes more surreal, stylish and engrossing. It’s a small ensemble comedy with some surprising twists that does some impressive gymnastics and social maneuvering to keep from going crazy and ending things on the spot. It asks the question, “Is being curious as an adult a bad thing?” And never does Patrick Brice’s film, despite how outrageous and strange it becomes, cross that line that would make you think otherwise.

Part of what makes “The Overnight” work so well is that it really is an “adult comedy”. Unlike the Seth Rogen movies of the world, the characters of “The Overnight” really are adults, and not just oversized man-children. Alex and Emily (Adam Scott and Taylor Schilling) are parents of the pre-school aged RJ but are also new to the Los Angeles neighborhood. At a party for a friend of RJ’s, they hit it off with Kurt (Jason Schwartzman). Kurt seduces them effortlessly with his sophistication and cultured charm, but Schwartzman’s performance, an actor who began his career in “Rushmore” as someone mature and adult beyond his age, is balanced enough that Kurt seems effete without ever appearing insincere.

Kurt invites them to a dinner party with his wife Charlotte (Judith Godreche) and open Alex and Emily up to a whole realm of adult “experimenting” as soon as the kids are in bed. What transpires is a mix of uncomfortable humor, free-spirited celebration and eventually, drunken, delirious tripping out.

Brice navigates these sudden twists in tone with the same hilariously awkward thud that Alex and Emily might be feeling, namely because Kurt and Charlotte are so confidently cultured and European. Their home is a modern fortress, and Kurt regales Alex with his work desalinizing water from feces, doing abstract artwork of people’s buttholes, and putting their children to sleep with synth-driven lullabies.

TheOvernight

Alex meanwhile is just trying to stay afloat, desperately treading water to make it seem like he and his wife are smarter than they are. Brice opens the film with their own marital struggles, having sex at the crack of dawn in a race to beat their son awake, and each furiously finishing on their own because of their inability to satisfy the other sexually. Their frustrations, inadequacies and embarrassment at the party is so relatable, in part because of Adam Scott’s clueless demeanor as he fast talks his way out of trouble, and Taylor Schilling’s over-enthusiastic smiles and hand gestures that show how desperately they want to fit in.

The characters are constantly pushing the limits of finding the threshold, the point when things simply get too weird and they force themselves to leave. At that point, the movie would be over, and while the characters constantly push the boundaries, the movie never gets there. Thankfully, it’s Alex and Emily who throw their hands up before we do.

“The Overnight” probes at challenging situation comedy and the difficulties of friendship, marriage, parenting and new experiences with equal parts grace and awkwardness. It’s never uproariously funny or a life changing few hours (actually, the film clocks in at a brief 79 minutes). But just as Alex and Emily will remember what happened here for a long time to come, so will we.

3 stars

Moonrise Kingdom

As “Moonrise Kingdom” begins, a boy is listening to a record of Benjamin Britton classical music compositions intended for children. A high-pitched, nonthreatening kid’s voice interrupts the song to explain the intricate layers of Britton’s piece, and the boy appreciates it all the more.

Wes Anderson’s seventh feature film is much like this record: an art house picture pieced together and slowly revealed to us like an elaborate opera. It has characters, themes and a silly tone that a child could embrace, and yet its presentation has complexity and maturity that may be beyond most adults. In this way, “Moonrise Kingdom” is one of the wackiest, most inventive, and most notably, the most heartfelt film Anderson ever made. Here then is a movie about growing up, independence, living above your age and loving the beauty of the more challenging and sophisticated pleasures of the world.

“Moonrise Kingdom” is the romance fairytale of Sam and Suzy (newcomers Jared Gilman and Kara Hayward), two preteens who escape their parental care to elope on a hidden cove on their small island home of New Penzance. Sam is a nerdy orphan, the most unpopular boy amongst his summer camp Khaki Scouts (by a significant margin), and yet a skilled mountaineer and adventurer. Suzy is the oldest child in a dysfunctional family, and she’s at an age where her needs cannot be met by her two unhappy parents. The couple is tracked by the lone island cop Captain Sharp (Bruce Willis), Sam’s camp counselor, Scout Master Ward (Edward Norton), and Suzy’s two parents, Walt and Laura Bishop (Bill Murray and Frances McDormand). Continue reading “Moonrise Kingdom”

Fantastic Mr. Fox

Why has Wes Anderson not been making movies like “Fantastic Mr. Fox” his entire career? This charmingly stop motion animated kids movie is as perfectly in Anderson’s style as any film he’s ever made, and his colorful and peculiar quirks fit in beautifully with Roald Dahl’s lovingly crafted story. Continue reading “Fantastic Mr. Fox”

The Darjeeling Limited

I find it almost pointless to attempt to describe and review “The Darjeeling Limited” because the best way to describe any element of the film would be by saying it is a Wes Anderson movie. What does it look like? It looks like Wes Anderson shot it. Is it funny? That would depend on whether you thought Wes Anderson movies were funny. What’s it about? I have no idea.

Does it sound like I don’t like this movie? Film criticism is about describing the reaction you personally had as a viewer and about how you changed upon coming out of it. I can sadly report however that I had little to no reaction to it. The seemingly pointless irreverence of the film is well made, quirky and atmospheric, but it bounced off me as though there were nothing to gain from the experience.

It tells the story of three oddball brothers who come together for the first time in a year since their father’s funeral to ride the Darjeeling Limited train and explore India for an enlightening experience. Continue reading “The Darjeeling Limited”

Rapid Response: Rushmore

When Wes Anderson made “Rushmore,” his second film, he desperately tried to get it screened for the film critic Pauline Kael long after she had retired and was close to her death. I’m not sure if her reaction was good, but I imagine the reason he tried to screen it for her was because his film was simply so different. Being released in 1998, it’s not so much ahead of its time because it kicked off this style of film making for the next decade, but it feels very much like a 2000s movie.

How should Anderson have reacted if he had a feeling he was ushering in the next generation of the movies?

I’ve seen five of six of Anderson’s films, all of them in a peculiar order. “Rushmore” is the movie that put him on the map, along with the film’s co-screenwriter Owen Wilson, Jason Schwartzman (very young here) and would solidify the sorts of low-key older man roles Bill Murray would take until today.

But my first outing with the director was with “The Life Aquatic of Steve Zissou,” a film that is equally odd and clearly identifiable in Anderson’s colorful yet distant visual style, but features Murray in the lead and seems more “classically” funny. Unlike “Rushmore,” it has what you would call “jokes.”

That’s not to say “Rushmore” isn’t funny; it’s hilarious. It’s to say “Rushmore’s” comedy is very much centered around attitude and absurd attention to detail in a quirky screenplay.

But in fact, all of Anderson’s films play and look in this fashion. That’s what makes him striking as a director. It is impossible to watch even a few moments of one of his movies and not recognize it as such.

The fans he established with “Rushmore” would say he fine-tuned his craft to perfection in “The Royal Tenenbaums,” a film I’ll have to revisit but others have heralded as a cult masterpiece. Then he worked with Noah Baumbach (another disciple of his) on “Life Aquatic” and allowed that quirky attitude to meet situational comedy. And Anderson soon got to the point at which his “The Darjeeling Limited” was overstuffed in Anderson’s style that it felt like nothing more than a vehicle for Anderson’s quirks. Finally is “Fantastic Mr. Fox” what I feel is his finest film. That stop-motion animated picture felt so much like an Anderson movie without sacrificing any of its childlike charm that you wonder why he hadn’t made stop-motion animated films his entire career.

Watching “Rushmore,” it did become obvious that his movies have always felt like cartoons of sorts. “Rushmore” is hardly “about” anything, its characters fit into no reasonable human mold, its scenarios are largely absurd and overblown, yet the characters and the world in which they live are so richly “drawn” that it casts a spell nonetheless.

I’m glad I finally got around to seeing “Rushmore,” as I finally understand Anderson’s significance as a modern auteur of film.